The proposed RBA algorithm is best understood as a hybrid quantum-classical method. The classical computer performs the problem-dependent preprocessing: it discretizes the ODE or PDE, composes the timestep map over a window of m-timesteps, identifies the reduced polynomial basis, and computes the RBA matrix coefficients. The quantum computer then amplitude-encodes the lifted monomial vector and applies the block-encoded RBA operator to recover the m-step discrete nonlinear update.
For PDE discretizations where stencil locality can be exploited, the quantum register scales as O(Dlog(N)+nm^(D+1)log p), where D is the number of spatial dimensions, N is the number of grid points per spatial direction, n is the number of fields, m is the number of composed timesteps, and p is the polynomial degree of the nonlinear update. Thus, the method achieves logarithmic scaling in the global grid size, giving an exponential compression of the spatial degrees of freedom compared with classical grid-based storage, while retaining polynomial scaling in the time. This time scaling improves over the copy-based approach of Leyton and Osborne [2], where quantum resources grow exponentially with integration time. It is closer to the mean-field nonlinear algorithms of Lloyd et al. [3], which also have polynomial time scaling, but RBA has the advantage that it represents the chosen fully discrete nonlinear dynamics exactly, rather than introducing mean-field errors that can accumulate over time. The approach is also competitive with Carleman linearization, where truncation, conditioning, and convergence restrictions can prevent accurate recovery of the nonlinear evolution.
The main limitation is the classical preprocessing cost. Although the quantum register scales favorably, constructing the reduced basis and RBA matrix can be exponentially expensive in m in the worst case, since the polynomial degree of the composed map grows as p^m. In practice, this cost may be lowered for local PDE discretizations because the reduced local basis and RBA matrix need only be constructed for each distinct stencil type and can then be reused across all grid points with the same local structure. Therefore, the approach is most promising for large PDE systems with local, repeated stencil structure and compact reduced bases. Reuse across different problems is also possible when the governing polynomial structure, discretization, timestep, parameters, and boundary treatment are sufficiently similar.